Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:46:39 -0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
please remove my name from this list, if not i will begin to spam the list
with files of 100 pages
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Romano <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:44 PM
Subject: Tinned Fruit Diplomacy
>Since we're telling anecdotes about "PC"...
>
>About 20 years ago, I was working as a lowly grad student in the offices of
>the American Studies Assn at the University of Pennsylvania, and somehow
>found myself giving a report at the plenary session of the biennial
>convention in Minneapolis (while also doing odd jobs such as making sure
>there was enough fruit cocktail to go around at the luncheon and helping
>overseas members with travel connections). I had been the
>moderator/amanuensis for several sessions attended by delegates from many
>"third world" countries. The prevailing sentiment among these delegates
was
>that they did not want All Things American forced upon them but wanted to
>take from this culture, society, and government only what was good, or what
>they perceived as good for them, and to say no-thank-you to the rest. At
>the plenary session, the main thrust of my little here's-how-it-went
speech
>was the desire expressed by the delegates for cultural autonomy and
>self-determination. During the course of my remarks, I happened to refer
to
>these "third world" countries as "some of the poorest countries of the
>world" or something like that. When I was finished speaking, a delegate
>from some foreign country--I think it was Pakistan--but certainly not one
of
>the delegates at the sessions I had moderated--demanded that Dr. Romano
take
>back the word "poorest" and that it be stricken from the official record of
>the proceedings!
>
>Tim Romano
>
>P.S. The British delegation in their journal thanked the president of the
>American Association for hosting the convention, and me, in particular, for
>my "ubiquity".
|
|
|