Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:55:26 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I thought this might be relavent:
I've been doing some reading on Pound in Italy: Hamilton's _The Appeal of
Fascism_ is an intelligent look at the political and philosophical climate
of Europe and the contributions made by various intellectuals and
non-intellectuals alike--philosophers, poets, painters and sculptors
included. T. S. Eliot spoke favorably of Sir Oswald Mosley, a fascists in
Britain; I believe W. B. Yeats actually declared himself a fascist against
the rising tide of socialism and futurism: two schools of thought and
politics that were focused upon the dismantling of cultural connections with
the past. One futurist in Italy, Marinetti, wanted to ". . . burn all
gondolas and 'fill the stinking little canals' of Venice 'with the ruins of
crumbling, leprous palaces' [a widely circulating view at the time]." The
attitude that I get from most intelligent sources tends to characterize the
philosophical climate as obviously threatening to neoclassicists, modernists
like Pound and Wyndham Lewis--its an attitude which seems to be difficult
for ("20/20") hindsight. Joyce makes an interesting comment: "Not to like
it [Italy] because of Mussolini would be just as absurd as to hate England
because of Henry the Eighth"; which is to say that they had a whole other
attitude over there (in Europe) at all; Americans probably wouldn't fathom
such an idea at the time.
|
|
|