 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:58:06 -0800 |
| In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.3.96.981019120247.9615B-100000@tiger> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>myriad books exist attempting to -explain- hitler. but i think bob's
>point is well taken--none of these books have succeeded, and they have
>amounted to a lot of tinkering with facts, confusing how the man actually
>was. maybe there is no actual knowing: lots of possibilities, and a good
>amount of ideas generated, but still no objective proof. we sit looking
>in all these directions, but still see no flashing lights.
Hitler may be more horrible than, but no more inexplicable
than, the rest of the universe.
As a graffito in the men's john at MIT says:
"THERE IS NO COMPLETELY SATISFACTORY THEORY OF ANYTHING"
[log in to unmask]
"Peace comes of communication."-- Ezra Pound
"Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech
or of the press..." -- Anon
"To live well is to live with adequate information"-- Norbert Weiner
|
|
|
