----- Original Message -----
From: "charles moyer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: Julius Evola


> Yes, Peter, that was one of the charges against them among others.   But
> please don't misconstrue my comment as an endorsement of the  Fa Lun Gong
> movement.
> CDM
> ----------
> >From: Peter Bi <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: Julius Evola
> >Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2001, 12:04 PM
> >
>
> > CMD: "Thou shalt not not believe in science".   Do you mean Fa-Lun-Gong
?
> >
> > Peter Bi
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "charles moyer" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: Julius Evola
> >
> >
> >> Wayne,
> >>     Thank you for that information. You write, "I wonder why you link
this
> >> 'high-minded' racist (Evola) with Robert Graves?"
> >>     It seems to me that in the sense of being traditionalists, looking
> >> beyond and above any charges of "racism", Pound, Evola, and Graves had
a
> >> similar view of the value of ancient wisdom. Call it mytho-poetic,
> >> Hyperborean, or Celtic- whatever-it translates somewhat  the same; that
it
> >> is something in the past worthy of examination and even perhaps of
> > revival.
> >> Progress, however, teaches us to formulate new "crimes against
humanity"
> > as
> >> recently in China where now it has been decreed "Thou shalt not not
> > believe
> >> in science".  How's that for high-mindedness?
> >>     I would like to see your notes on Evola. I leave it to you as to
the
> >> venue.
> >>
> >> CDM
> >>
> >
>