----------
>From: Jack Savage <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: The Incoherence of the Pound List
>Date: Fri, Dec 21, 2001, 4:50 AM
>

>>From: Tim Bray <[log in to unmask]>
>>Reply-To: - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine
>>    <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: The Incoherence of the Pound List
>>Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 20:47:20 -0800
>>
>>At 05:57 PM 20/12/01 -0500, Daniel Pearlman wrote:
>> >  Having taught graduate courses in both Pound and
>> >Frost, I have to say that I have gradually come to see--without any
>> >suggestion of devaluing Pound or all that I have learned from him--that
>> >Frost appears the more tuned-in in every way, and is even, in the
>> >political realm, far more astute than Pound.
>>
>>Your average turnip is more politically astute than was Pound.
>>No disrespect at all to the excellent Frost.  -Tim
>
>
> Frost .... "tuned-in" ... "astute" ... ???
>
> I look forward to someone putting forth the proposition
> that Eliot had a profound understanding of women.

I for one would like someone to tell me just what Frost's politics were.
Did Solzhenitsyn move to New England to find out?
    Eliot at least understood Jessie Weston, at one time. Could someone
offer an example of a writer from the period who had "a profound
understanding of women"?

Charles
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.