EPOUND-L Archives

- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine

EPOUND-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
pcockram <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 22:16:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Leon Surette wrote:
 
>  Everything I have read about Fascism
> and Nazism identifies both movements as entirely bourgeois--petit bourgeois,
> to be sure, but certainly bourgeois.
>     The anti-bourgeois movement of the thirties was Communism or Bolshevism.
 
I tend to think both Communism and Fascism were anti-bourgeois, at least in
theory -- that is, they opposed middle class liberal individualism.   Both
championed the agricultural and artisanal classes and claimed to be populist,
though they were also elitist.  The Fascists considered themselves the only
rational choice between the two extremes of Communism and Capitalism, but they
inevitably had things in common with both.
 
best, Patricia

ATOM RSS1 RSS2