EPOUND-L Archives

- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine

EPOUND-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Bray <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 12 Dec 1999 15:04:49 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
At 11:50 AM 12/12/99 -1000, E.L. Lady wrote:
>Many of us remember that the science fiction writer Theodore Sturgeon
>once said, "90% of science fiction is crap.  But then 90% of anything is
>crap."  In the case of academic work, I think that that estimate is much
>too low.
 
Too low, probably.  But lay the stress on *everything*, modify it by the word
"contemporary", and you've got some real wisdom.  The only collections of
human creative output in which 90% is *not* crap are those whose practitioners
are pretty well all dead: Victorian novels, German Romantic symphonies,
Roman histories, 60s pop music.  Time weeds out the crap pretty effectively.
 
I don't observe that the poportion of dross to gold is higher in the output
of academics than in other areas of human endeavor. -Tim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2