Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 10 Dec 1999 16:58:02 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Lucas Klein wrote:
>
> > but I've lost the topic of Pound. Pound's writing seems to me
> essentially Western, based on a great misunderstanding of Chinese
> and Asian philosophy, language, tradition, poetry, etc. I haven't
> done
> anywhere near the amount of research required to back up this
> kind of statement, but well, is there anyone willing either to refute
> or
> support the idea that Pound just didn't get Asia?
I have a question about a project based on this idea, that Pound was
essentially Western. I wrote a brief thesis a few years ago using
Benedict Anderson's theory of imagined communities to argue that Pound
created his own "imagined community." It began with his participation
in London/Paris newspapers and politics. Later, his "nation" was
"populated" by his pen pals (or American politician recipients of his
letters) and "recipients" of his radio broadcasts. His interpretation
of Confucius/Mencius and the writings of Jefferson/Adams fueled his
hope for an American renaissance. In a way, Pound's misunderstandings
of Chinese philosophy reflect a westernization of it..
Throwing this at all of you in such brevity without explaining Benedict
Anderson's theory on nationalism is not fair. As a non-academic now,
my research has slowed down. But I would like some input from anyone
familiar with Anderson's theory on nationalism. My impression of Pound
has been from this angle (Pound as expatriot patriot American with a
Mencius twist). Any comments or suggestions? And for those of you not
familiar with Benedict Anderson, what can you say about the utopian
Pound?
Thanks,
Kristen Stevens
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
|
|
|