Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 06:31:07 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bob,
When I mention The Archetypal (as I have done in several contexts over the
past few months) you think in terms of socio-cultural paradigms. This is not
what I mean by the term. Also, an "assumed persona" --where ego scriptor
writes "in the voice" of some legendary person-- is not what I mean by the
archetypal, though it is possible that the person whose voice and role are
assumed represents an archetype. What I have in mind when using the term is
the immutable cross-cultural erotic geometry that brings Persephone to
Hades, Narcissus to Echo, foam-born Venus up from the sea into which the
blood of her father's castrated genitals had fallen, et cetera. I'm talking
about the soul's double-helix, if you will. It means we belong to the green
world. The green world does not belong to us.
Tim Romano
> tim,
> i can see the various personnae ep assumed qua
> ego scriptor; but, can't see anything archetypal
> ...as for example whitman's american adam,
> or emerson's jeremiah.
> how do you mean ep's "archetypal self"?
> another american adam?
>
> bob
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tim Romano <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 7:39 AM
> Subject: No place of grace
>
>
> > Bob,
> > With his discovery of the archetypal nature of the Self
> > Pound progressed from Solipsism into Nature and Creation
> > to rediscover 'the green world' thereby completing the circle.
> > This universal place of grace he saw threatened
> > by the relentless mechanization of human labor
> > by the rapacious exploitation of natural resource
> > by the endless barrage of soul-less advertisements
> > and other projections whose goal was destruction
> > of the inner-sanctum
> > that we may become insatiable hedonistic consumers
> > who show up for work on time
> > and pay every tax
> > and cheerfully submit our selves to the machine.
> >
> > Fascism was salvific for Pound for the paradoxical reasons you imply.
The
> > directed will seemed indeed a manful remedy for the smothering machine.
> > Fascism projected an image of the nobility of the artisan versus the
> > dehumanized slave-labor-units of soviet socialism. It seemed to hold
the
> > promise of no more red-tape ... a government that would govern least,
> > organized around the collective will of the skilled trades. Imagine how
> > powerful its attraction for a liberty-techne' freak like Pound.
> >
> > Tim Romano
>
>
|
|
|