ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen Merrill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:13:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I could not agree more.

I will take a potent defense as a great place to start.  It is easier to
score more goals than it is stop them from scoring.

Even if we do wind up second to BC it won't be a bad thing, though winning
would be so much better.

-Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Deron Treadwell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 10:08 AM
Subject: 3 out of 4 ain't bad


> We took 3 out of 4 points this weekend to move into a tie for
> second-place.  I think I heard a stat that said Maine had not won both
> games at Northeastern in something ridiculous like 11 years.. that said,
> to get a win and a tie has to be considered a successful weekend.
>
> The only negative on the weekend is that BC swept UMass to pull 5 points
> ahead of Maine.  We need to gain at least a point in the next two weeks to
> have a shot at playing them for the regular season title in Orono on the
> last weekend of the regular season.
>
> Goaltending continues to be outstanding for Maine.  Even Dunham and Snow
> were not this dominant in 1993, and they had a lot more offense to work
> with.
>
> This Maine team is young, but one you can really get behind.  If they find
> any kind of offensive, they will not be fun to play against.
>
> -Deron
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2