Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:21:45 GMT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bob, are you saying I am wrong?
Can you think of a better way for the oil companies to sabotage the Kyoto
agreement on "greenhouse" gas emissions, than to force governments to lower
taxes and then blame it on consumers?
I thought you liked conspiracy theories?
Richard Edwards
>From: bob scheetz <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine
> <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: samizdat
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 22:04:09 -0400
>
>richard,
> o'course, "the view over here" yer parroting
>is also the gov't line, no?
>
>bob
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Richard Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 11:15 AM
>Subject: Re: samizdat
>
>
> > Bob, I didn't know you were such a supporter of big business. The view
>here
> > is that the oil companies colluded with the protesters. If taxes on fuel
> > come down, demand will rise and so will the net price. Since the
>protests
>at
> > the refinery gates were on the whole peaceful and non-obstructive - not
> > really a blockade at all - the oil companies could have continued to
>deliver
> > fuel if they had wanted to. Instead, the theory is that they decided it
>was
> > in their better interests to sit by whilst schools closed, hospitals
> > cancelled operations, and nearly everyone suffered interference to
>varying
> > degrees in their ordinary family lives, work and leisure.
> >
> > Richard Edwards (boojwa kitch culture swindler?)
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
|
|
|