Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 1992 11:27:20 CDT |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dan writes:
>Dean, I don't thingk you'll have to worry about any great hockey players
>coming out of the state of Wisconsin (except maybe Marty Wiitala from
>Superior).
???????????????????????????????????????
Wisconsin boys: Mark Johnson
Craig Ludwig
Gary Suter
Bob Suter
Marc Behrend
Lane MacDonald
Barry Richter
etc.
>Sauer does a good job (being the Minnesota boy that he is) considering the
>Minnesota players he gets are usually 2nd rate.
??????????????????????????????????????????
Second rate players: Sean Hill
(from Minn.) Paul Ranheim
Jim and John Johannson
Mark Osiecki
etc.
I must have missed the smileys that were meant to go along with the
above comments. Of course, Wisconsin does not produce anywhere
near the number of players that Minn. does but your knowledge of
Wis. natives seems a bit thin. As far as Wis. recruiting 2nd rate
Minn players, I suppose only those kids who want to win a NCAA
championship come to Wis. nowadays. (My apologies to Erik, Carol,
Pam, and other informed Gopher fans but sometimes cheap shots are
necessary.)
>The whole point of offering a scholarship to an athlete is SUPPOSED to be
>for educating him. In that case, the benefit should be given to
>citizens of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Not foreigners. Period.
>Maybe that's why people think they should recruit instate.
Perhaps you see some logic in these statements but I doubt if many
other people do. If the point is to educate athletes, why do you
feel that foreign athletes don't qualify for this education? I am
sure that UM, SCSU, and UMD are just like Wis. in welcoming students
of all nationalities because it fosters a broader range of ideas.
As a graduate student, surely you must come across journal articles
that are written by foreigners. Or is this personally verboten?
---mark grassl
|
|
|