>
> If you want serious anomalies, try ranking football teams that play a
> dozen or less games ;-)
Computer rankings are highly suspect in NCAA football because the data
is WAY too sparse to be credible. Heck, the college hockey schedule
hardly provides enough games for a statistically sound ranking.
>
>> RHEAL since WI had three 4's and a 5 so paged down and found it at Ohio
>> State. That seemed anomolous, but then looked at OSU closer - the only
>> reason this looks anomolous is that OSU was slammed by KRACH - 13th
>> compared to 4, 5 and 7. So I'm wondering - why is OSU so low on KRACH?
>
>
> .....
>
> Also, I'm guessing that Krach "sees" the OSU loss to Mercyhurst as
> structurally important, whereas it's simply a loss as far as HEAL is
> concerned.
KRACH doesn't care whether OSU lost to Mercyhust or someone else; it
only matters who OSU has played and what OSU's record is. Ditto for
Mercyhurst.