Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:06:24 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Richard Seddon wrote:
>
> Dirk:
>
> The essay by Fenellosa (edited by Pound) has an extensive analysis of verbs
> and nouns especially in the context of the Chinese ideograph.
>
> I'll give you one quote which, perhaps, is germane to our discussion.
>
> "A true noun, an isolated thing, does not exist in nature. Things are only
> the terminal point, or rather the meeting points, of actions, cross-sections
> cut through actions, snapshots. Neither can a pure verb, an abstract
> motion, be possible in nature. The eye sees noun and verb as one; things in
> motion, motion in things, and so the Chinese conception tends to represent
> them." (page 10)
>
Try out for the fun of it the following as a paraphrase of this quote
from Fenellosa: "One divides into two, NOT Two combine into one."
Carrol
> Rick Seddon
> McIntosh, NM
|
|
|