In a message dated 06/22/2000 2:02:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<< It seems to me incorrect to divorce Pound's views on the SOCIAL
PRACTICES of religion from his adherence to fascist political philosophy. >>
now, why should this objection surprise anyone? after all, according to this
smear tactic, everything that Pound said or did was connected to "his
adherence to fascist political philosophy." the needle is stuck -- could
someone give it a shove?
jb...