ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deron Treadwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 17:19:37 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (202 lines)
> USCHO.com Division I Men's Poll
> March 5, 2001
>
>    Team (First Place Votes)   Record  Pts   Last
>  1 Michigan State (39)       28- 4-4  598     1
>  2 Boston College (1)        26- 8-2  540     3
>  3 North Dakota              24- 5-9  537     2
>  4 St. Cloud                 27- 8-1  485     5
>  5 Minnesota                 25-10-2  412     4
>  6 Michigan                  22-11-5  368     6
>  7 New Hampshire             20-10-6  327     7
>  8 Colorado College          22-11-1  302     9
>  9 Clarkson                  20- 9-3  290    10
> 10 Maine                     17-10-7  262    12
> 11 Providence                19-10-5  207     8
> 12 Wisconsin                 19-13-4  153    11
> 13 Nebraska-Omaha            22-13-3  117    14
> 14 Miami (OH)                20-14-2   82     -
> 15 Denver                    19-13-4   46     -
>
> Others receiving votes: St. Lawrence 30, Western Michigan 29,
> Northern Michigan 6, Rensselaer 4, MSU-Mankato 3, Dartmouth 2
>
> The USCHO.com Poll is compiled by U.S. College Hockey Online, and
> consists
> of 40 voters, including 27 coaches from the Division I conferences and
> 13
> beat writers from across the country. The poll is published weekly by
> the
> Associated Press.
>
> 2000-2001 Division I Men's Pairwise Rankings (PWR)
> Through Sunday, March 4, 2001
>
> Rk Team                GP  W- L- T  Win%  Rk     RPI  Rk  PWR
> Rk Team                GP  W- L- T  Win%  Rk     RPI  Rk  PWR
>  1 Michigan State      36 28- 4- 4 0.8333  1 | 0.6311  1 | 29
>  2 Boston College      36 26- 8- 2 0.7500  3 | 0.6091  2 | 28
>  3 North Dakota        38 24- 5- 9 0.7500  3 | 0.5975  3 | 27
>  4 St. Cloud           36 27- 8- 1 0.7639  2 | 0.5873  4 | 25
>  5 Minnesota           37 25-10- 2 0.7027  5 | 0.5785  5 | 25
>  6 Michigan            38 22-11- 5 0.6447 10 | 0.5707  7 | 24
>  7 New Hampshire       36 20-10- 6 0.6389 11 | 0.5576  9 | 21
>  8 Clarkson            32 20- 9- 3 0.6719  6 | 0.5573 10 | 21
>  9 Colorado College    34 22-11- 1 0.6618  7 | 0.5739  6 | 20
> 10 Maine               34 17-10- 7 0.6029 14 | 0.5591  8 | 20
> 11 Providence          34 19-10- 5 0.6324 12 | 0.5558 11 | 19
> 12 Nebraska-Omaha      36 20-13- 3 0.5972 15 | 0.5327 17 | 18
> 13 Wisconsin           36 19-13- 4 0.5833 17 | 0.5533 13 | 16
> 14 Miami               36 20-14- 2 0.5833 17 | 0.5362 15 | 16
> 15 Mercyhurst          31 19-10- 2 0.6452  9 | 0.5318 18 | 15
> 16 Denver              36 19-13- 4 0.5833 17 | 0.5547 12 | 14
> 17 Quinnipiac          34 20-10- 4 0.6471  8 | 0.5332 16 | 14
> 18 Canisius            29 15-10- 4 0.5862 16 | 0.5091 24 | 14
> 19 Western Michigan    36 19-11- 6 0.6111 13 | 0.5403 14 | 12
> 20 MSU-Mankato         36 19-16- 1 0.5417 27 | 0.5301 19 |  9
> 21 Northern Michigan   34 16-11- 7 0.5735 22 | 0.5245 20 |  9
> 22 St. Lawrence        32 16-12- 4 0.5625 23 | 0.5201 21 |  9
> 23 UMass-Lowell        34 17-14- 3 0.5441 26 | 0.5178 22 |  7
> 24 Cornell             29 13-11- 5 0.5345 28 | 0.5085 25 |  6
> 25 Rensselaer          32 17-13- 2 0.5625 23 | 0.5032 26 |  5
> 26 Dartmouth           29 13-12- 4 0.5172 29 | 0.4981 30 |  4
> 27 Iona                31 16-11- 4 0.5806 21 | 0.5032 27 |  3
> 28 Yale                29 14-14- 1 0.5000 30 | 0.4963 33 |  3
> 29 Alabama-Huntsville  24 14-10- 0 0.5833 17 | 0.5011 29 |  2
> 30 Sacred Heart        30 14-11- 5 0.5500 25 | 0.4808 37 |  0
>
> The Pairwise Ranking is a system which attemps to mimic the method used
> by
> the NCAA Selection Committee to determine participants for the NCAA
> Division I men's ice hockey tournament. The PWR compares teams at or
> above
> .500, judging them by five criteria: record against common opponents,
> record in last 16 games, head to head competition, record against other
> teams at or above .500, and the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI).
>
> For each comparison won, a team receives one point. The final PWR
> ranking
> is based on the number of points (comparisons) won against teams at or
> above .500. Ties are settled by the RPI.
>
> The PWR can be reformatted and redistributed by any media outlet or
> person, provided USCHO's URL (http://www.uscho.com/) accompanies the
> results.
>
> Note: A team's record is based only on games against other Division I
> hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament. In
> particular,
> only non-exhibition matchups between schools in the six major
> conferences
> count towards a team's record as used in the RPI and PWR. Other games,
> including contests against Canadian schools and tournament-ineligible
> D-I
> programs, are not counted.
>
>
> USCHO.com Division I Women's Poll
> March 5, 2001
>
>    Team (First Place)       Record  Pts   Last
>  1 Dartmouth (10)          23- 3-1  100     1
>  2 Minnesota-Duluth        23- 5-4   89     2
>  3 Minnesota               23- 7-2   77     2
>  4 Harvard                 21- 8-0   72     4
>  5 St. Lawrence            22- 6-3   62     5
>  6 Brown                   18- 6-3   46     6
>  7 Wisconsin               19- 8-5   42     7
>  8 Northeastern            16-14-1   30     8
>  9 New Hampshire           17-16-0   17     9
> 10 Providence              18-13-3    9    10
>
> Others receiving votes: Niagara 5, Ohio State 1
>
> The USCHO.com Poll is compiled by U.S. College Hockey Online, and
> consists
> of 10 voters, each a coach of a Division I program.
>
> 2000-2001 Division I Women's Pairwise Rankings (PWR)
> Through Sunday, March 4, 2001
>
> Rk Team                GP  W- L- T  Win%  Rk     RPI  Rk  PWR
>  1 Dartmouth           27 23- 3- 1 0.8704  1 | 0.6566  1 | 14
>  2 Minnesota-Duluth    32 23- 5- 4 0.7812  2 | 0.6206  2 | 13
>  3 Minnesota           32 23- 7- 2 0.7500  4 | 0.6140  3 | 12
>  4 Harvard             29 21- 8- 0 0.7241  5 | 0.6126  4 | 11
>  5 St. Lawrence        31 22- 6- 3 0.7581  3 | 0.6083  5 | 10
>  6 Brown               27 18- 6- 3 0.7222  6 | 0.5980  6 |  9
>  7 Wisconsin           32 19- 8- 5 0.6719  7 | 0.5654  7 |  8
>  8 Northeastern        31 16-14- 1 0.5323 10 | 0.5374  8 |  7
>  9 New Hampshire       33 17-16- 0 0.5152 12 | 0.5322  9 |  6
> 10 Niagara             33 16-13- 4 0.5455  9 | 0.5087 10 |  5
> 11 Providence          32 16-13- 3 0.5469  8 | 0.5079 11 |  4
> 12 Princeton           29 13-13- 3 0.5000 15 | 0.5053 12 |  3
> 13 Ohio State          34 16-15- 3 0.5147 14 | 0.5025 13 |  2
> 14 Maine               30 15-14- 1 0.5167 11 | 0.4962 14 |  1
> 15 St. Cloud           33 16-15- 2 0.5152 12 | 0.4947 15 |  0
>
> The Pairwise Ranking is a system which attemps to mimic the method used
> by
> the NCAA Selection Committee to determine participants for the NCAA
> Division I women's ice hockey tournament. The PWR compares teams at or
> above .500, judging them by five criteria: record against common
> opponents, record in last 16 games, head to head competition, record
> against other teams at or above .500, and the Ratings Percentage Index
> (RPI)
>
> For each comparison won, a team receives one point. The final PWR
> ranking
> is based on the number of points (comparisons) won against teams at or
> above .500. Ties are settled by the RPI.
>
> The PWR can be reformatted and redistributed by any media outlet or
> person, provided USCHO's URL (http://www.uscho.com/) accompanies the
> results.
>
> Note: A team's record is based only on games against other Division I
> hockey schools which play in a Division I conference. In particular,
> only
> non-exhibition matchups between schools in the ECAC, GLWHL and WCHA
> conferences and non-conference games (denoted "NC" in USCHO's schedules)
> between these teams count towards a team's record as used in the RPI and
> PWR. Other games, including contests against Canadian schools and
> tournament-ineligible D-I programs, are not counted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> X-SMTP-From: [log in to unmask]
> X-SMTP-To: [log in to unmask]
> X-SMTP-To: [log in to unmask]
> X-SMTP-To: [log in to unmask]
> Received: from mail.uscollegehockey.com (mail.uscollegehockey.com
> [209.98.236.138]) by voyager.umeres.maine.edu with SMTP id MSGOGSQG;
> Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:02:44 GMT
> Received: from localhost (info@localhost) by
> slapshot.uscollegehockey.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26422; Mon,
> 5 Mar 2001 19:00:05 -0600
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:00:05 -0600 (CST)
> From: Lee Urton <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Lee Urton <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: USCHO.com Polls - 03/05/2001
> Message-ID:
> <[log in to unmask]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2