Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jan 1998 08:26:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Jan 1998 13:36:42 GMT wrote...
>
Tim Redmond is doing a new one as we write, according to a discussion on just
this subject a couple of months ago. Lots of people have favorite bios, and in
the exchange of a few months past, they pointed out the strengths and
weaknesses of all of them. I fancy Carpenter's book--maybe because it is the
one that I have made the most use of when researching basic information on
Pound. It is loaded.
Forgive me if this is a FAQ, but I'd like the opinions of Pound scholars on
>the relative merits of the various Pound biographies - Carpenter, Stock,
>Tytell, Ackroyd, Norman - briefly, of course!
>Also, are there any new biographies in preparation?
>Thanks, Sarah.
>
>
Robert E. Kibler
Department of English
University of Minnesota
[log in to unmask]
fortunatus et ille, deos qui novit agrestis,
Panaque Silvanumque senem Nymphasque sorores.
|
|
|