Come on.  Implying the goalie lost the BC game is like worrying about
nosebleed when the patient has an artery gushing blood.  Yes, the 3rd
goal was a gift (Howard gets the puck out in the corner and does a
corner-to-corner pass, interrupted by the back of his goal; BC scoops up
the loose  puck and tucks it in the open net), but one goal was
deflected right in front of him, and the other goal was nice snap shot
between the faceoff dots.  Howard was going down in the butterfly, but
the puck was perfectly in the five hole and just quick enough to get
through.

Now, where is the offense going to come from?   It hasn't been there
against the better teams, IMHO.

Having your goalie & defense to hold the opposition to 0 or 1 goals may
be a "goal", but it's going to be tough to have a winning record that way.

I don't know how you add scoring to the mix, but Maine seems to have
some good new players, so maybe it will be possible?

cheers, wayne

james acheson wrote:

> so... you stick Lundin in net, the boys play offense in front of him
> and stop worrying about the gaa and save percentage and win 6-5.  I
> mean, jeez the d was only responsible for 1 goal in this game, and
> Jimmy gave away 2.  It is clear to me, and I know a few others that
> tandem goalies is the way to go... make them conpete against each
> other and they both get better. at the very least Lundin would not
> have done any better in a league points-wise analysis against BC and
> BU, and I am sure against Merrimack.  Lundin could have lost those 2
> games too, but at least we would have 2 goalies competing against one
> another.
>
>
>
> */Bob Woodbury <[log in to unmask]>/* wrote:
>
>     BC wins 3-1. Maine not showing enough to beat UNH tomorrow, either.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com <http://www.yahoo.com>