ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Hill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:54:42 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1049 bytes) , reply (1103 bytes)
I am sending this as a test since I sent out 2 messages hours ago and still have not gotten them.
>
> From: Nonni Daly <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2003/01/18 Sat PM 04:17:13 EST
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> In a message dated 1/18/03 12:31:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > Yeah i have one thing, there will be very little alternating goalies once
> > the playoffs start.
>
> Gee, remember people who said that about Mike Dunham back a few years ago and
> seem to forget that he was the one pulled in two very important games.  I
> didn't see the game, but it sounded as if there was little defensive help in
> front.  Kinda hard to let a rebound go when there is no one there to take it
> away ... it's a little early to start counting anyone out, isn't it?  Would
> have been very easy to do that based on Howard's performance at the juniors,
> too -- wouldn't it?  These are young men playing a game ... and only that.
> Both Doyle and Howard are good goaltenders and should be exactly what Maine
> needs down the stretch run.
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2