EPOUND-L Archives

- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine

EPOUND-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Savage <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:30:14 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
>From: Tim Bray <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine
>    <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Those who can do. Those who can't cant.
>Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:28:15 -0800
>
>At 05:20 PM 22/03/02 -0500, R.Gancie/C.Parcelli wrote:
> >There's a certain desperation in the Neo-Formalist camp that
> >is akin to the Langpos. They want acceptance at the
> >imaginative level but they have produced no viable canon of
> >work.
>
>There are of course very fine living poets who write
>(at least occasionally) in formal structure: Vikram
>Seth and Derek Walcott come to mind.  I'm not aware
>of any instances of these artists expressing an opinion
>that they have a monopoly on the One True Form, nor
>are they prone to fling epithets such as "degeneracy".
>
>There's a lesson here.  -Tim


"formal structure" ?

would that be Homer or Frost?
Houseman or Milton?

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2