Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:58:45 -0500 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Does anyone know what the guidelines are in the NCAA between assessing a
> game misconduct or a game disqualification?
>
There are some answers in the interpretations at the back of the rulebook.
The discussion of kneeing includes this approved ruling:
RULING: A minor penalty
> should be assessed in most situations. When the knee is used in a flagrant
> or violent manner, a major penalty should be assessed. Whenever injury
> results from fouling an opponent with a knee, a disqualification penalty
> must be assessed.
>
A similar entry is made for elbowing.
Under hitting from behind, the only AR is a scenario where an injury is
caused, and it is said that the referee assesses a DQ.
So it would appear to me that causing injury seems to mandate
disqualification, and is therefore the effective dividing line between a
disqualification and a misconduct.
John
--
John Edwards
I used to put quotes here.
|
|
|