Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:30:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tony,
Thanks for the note, and sorry for the confusion in Coach Sauer's
column. Only Division III schools will vote on the propsed reforms;
we've made an edit to clarify the column:
http://www.insidecollegehockey.com/7Archives/Columns/thedean_0214.htm
Thanks,
Nate
Nate Ewell
Inside College Hockey, Inc.
http://insidecollegehockey.com
"Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing ..."
> Hello All:
>
> Months ago I was told that the infamous proposal discussed below in
> Coach Sauer's column would be voted on by only D-III schools. However
> Sauer seems to indicate that ALL NCAA schools will vote. Does anyone
> have the correct scoop on this? If all schools vote, I will likely
try
> to swing a vote here at D-I Cal Poly.
>
> Thanks for any information. Since a lot of folks are interested (and
> might be in a position to influence a vote or two), please post any
> information to the list, and not only to me. Thanks ahead of time.
>
> Tony Buffa
> RPI '64
>
> ============
>
> From a column posted on Inside College Hockey:
>
> NOTE: he says FULL NCAA membership....
>
>
> The Dean's List by Jeff Sauer
>
> There is an issue out there in the that could affect the continued
> growth of the sport in the near future. Proposal 2-69 is a proposal
to
> be voted on by the full NCAA membership at its annual convention in
> Nashville Jan. 12. The proposal is one element of a broad reform
package
> proposed for Division III: a provision that would prevent any
Division
> III schools from awarding athletic scholarships, even in sports in
which
> they participate at the Division I level.
>
>
|
|
|