Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 1999 16:47:59 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> No offense but "the Mask" and the No Fighting rule has got to be the
> stupidest thing hockey has ever gone to. Former Flames, North Star and
> FIGHTING SIOUX Perry Berzin basically said that the mask was the reason
> college hockey was so rough and tumble (Stick work, etc). Look at the NHL
and
> stick incidents and you will see that the Europeans are way more careless
> witht their sticks and lot of it has to do with the lack of fighting and
the
> wearing of the Itech shield.
This is purely anecdotal -- I never hear it from any hockey players except
Canadians. I don't believe it, but I could be wrong to - there's nothing to
validate it than selective perception based on your own biases. From my
experience, I see nasty stick penalties all the time, and most every one of
them comes from Canadians. I've been with a pro team for two years that has
had Swedes, Russians and US College players -- and my personal observation
are the exact opposite of what you state .... but maybe that's my bias
showing.
Personally, I think two-handing someone as a form of checking is way more
prevalant today among ALL players. Watch Classic Sports and you'll see what
I mean. Today, using your stick like a lacrosse stick is very popular, and
dangerous.
> make the decision to wear or not wear a sheild. Ever notice when a player
> leaves college hockey how many of them keep wearing the mask, NADA.
Part of it is peer pressure, I think. PART of it - though I hate wearing a
shield myself.
AW
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|