>From: Daniel Pearlman <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine
>    <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: The Incoherence of the Pound List
>Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:32:42 -0500
>
>>Frost .... "tuned-in" ... "astute" ... ???
>>
>>I look forward to someone putting forth the proposition
>>that Eliot had a profound understanding of women.
>An understandable reaction to a provocative statement on my part.
>The above remark illustrates the fact that there continues to be an
>extremely superficial understanding of the work of Frost.  The two
>articles I've published on Frost (prelude to a long-researched and
>long-planned book on the subject) give a hint of what's still in the
>offing.
>==DP
>
>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
>Dan Pearlman's home page:
>http://pages.zdnet.com/danpearl/danpearlman/
>
>My new fiction collection, THE BEST-KNOWN MAN IN THE WORLD AND OTHER
>MISFITS, may be ordered online at http://www.aardwolfpress.com/
>"Perfectly-crafted gems": Jack Dann, Nebula & World Fantasy Award winner
>
>Director, Council for the Literature of the Fantastic:
>http://www.uri.edu/artsci/english/clf/
>
>OFFICE:
>Department of English
>University of Rhode Island
>Kingston, RI 02881
>Tel.: 401 874-4659
>Fax: (253) 681-8518
>email: [log in to unmask]


a superficial body of work hardly requires more
than a "superficial understanding"

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx