Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:35:05 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach (or dig up obscure facts
etc.). Its obvious why it seems no one on the Pound list writes poetry
in the spirit or with the rich complexity of the Cantos (present company
excepted.) The Pound list members lack the imagination.
As I've said before, I'm certain Pound would be pilloried on this list
for many of his ideas if he had not already earned a literary 'sinecure'
elsewhere. In short, Pound could not be a member of his own list. He
would for a time vigorously defend his 'silly' positions against the
cloacae. But ultimately he would have been driven off.
Dont' tell me that even in its most ironic sense half the people heard
from on this list would hound mercilessly anyone who proposed that if
'the (Confucian) classics had a wide circulation' in the U.S. that the
moral fiber of the country would be enhanced.
Or Frobenius. Or Douglas & Orage. Or a hundred other poetic conceits
Pound held. CP
>
|
|
|