ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deron Treadwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:01:40 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (200 lines)
> USCHO.com Division I Men's Poll
> February 26, 2001
>
>    Team (First Place Votes)   Record  Pts   Last
>  1 Michigan State (38)       27- 4-4  597     1
>  2 North Dakota (1)          22- 5-9  539     3
>  3 Boston College (1)        24- 8-2  537     2
>  4 Minnesota                 25- 8-2  457     4
>  5 St. Cloud                 25- 8-1  446     6
>  6 Michigan                  22-10-5  382     5
>  7 New Hampshire             19- 9-6  336     7
>  8 Providence                19- 8-5  325     9
>  9 Colorado College          21-10-1  306     8
> 10 Clarkson                  18- 9-3  215    11
> 11 Wisconsin                 17-13-4  170    10
> 12 Maine                     15-10-7  134    13
> 13 St. Lawrence              16-10-4  116    14
> 14 Nebraska-Omaha            20-13-3   93    15
> 15 Western Michigan          18-10-6   75    12
>
> Others receiving votes: Denver 50, Miami (OH) 12,
> Northern Michigan 7, Cornell 2, Harvard 1
>
> The USCHO.com Poll is compiled by U.S. College Hockey Online, and
> consists
> of 40 voters, including 27 coaches from the Division I conferences and
> 13
> beat writers from across the country. The poll is published weekly by
> the
> Associated Press.
>
> 2000-2001 Division I Men's Pairwise Rankings (PWR)
> Through Sunday, February 25, 2001
>
> Rk Team                GP  W- L- T  Win%  Rk     RPI  Rk  PWR
>  1 Michigan State      35 27- 4- 4 0.8286  1 | 0.6282  1 | 30
>  2 North Dakota        36 22- 5- 9 0.7361  4 | 0.6068  2 | 29
>  3 Boston College      34 24- 8- 2 0.7353  5 | 0.6054  3 | 28
>  4 Minnesota           35 25- 8- 2 0.7429  3 | 0.5830  4 | 27
>  5 St. Cloud           34 25- 8- 1 0.7500  2 | 0.5751  5 | 25
>  6 Michigan            37 22-10- 5 0.6622  8 | 0.5738  7 | 25
>  7 Colorado College    32 21-10- 1 0.6719  6 | 0.5739  6 | 23
>  8 Providence          32 19- 8- 5 0.6719  6 | 0.5672  9 | 23
>  9 New Hampshire       34 19- 9- 6 0.6471 11 | 0.5683  8 | 22
> 10 Clarkson            30 18- 9- 3 0.6500 10 | 0.5480 14 | 19
> 11 Nebraska-Omaha      36 20-13- 3 0.5972 15 | 0.5328 17 | 19
> 12 Wisconsin           34 17-13- 4 0.5588 19 | 0.5499 11 | 18
> 13 Maine               32 15-10- 7 0.5781 18 | 0.5483 13 | 17
> 14 Denver              34 17-13- 4 0.5588 19 | 0.5550 10 | 16
> 15 Western Michigan    34 18-10- 6 0.6176 13 | 0.5491 12 | 16
> 16 St. Lawrence        30 16-10- 4 0.6000 14 | 0.5334 15 | 16
> 17 Mercyhurst          29 18- 9- 2 0.6552  9 | 0.5322 18 | 16
> 18 Quinnipiac          32 18-10- 4 0.6250 12 | 0.5331 16 | 13
> 19 Canisius            27 14- 9- 4 0.5926 16 | 0.5088 25 | 13
> 20 Miami               34 18-14- 2 0.5588 19 | 0.5283 19 | 11
> 21 Northern Michigan   32 14-11- 7 0.5469 24 | 0.5229 21 |  9
> 22 MSU-Mankato         34 18-15- 1 0.5441 25 | 0.5247 20 |  8
> 23 Yale                27 14-13- 0 0.5185 29 | 0.5065 27 |  8
> 24 UMass-Lowell        33 16-14- 3 0.5303 28 | 0.5142 23 |  7
> 25 Cornell             27 12-10- 5 0.5370 26 | 0.5072 26 |  7
> 26 Ohio State          31 15-14- 2 0.5161 31 | 0.5183 22 |  6
> 27 Dartmouth           27 12-11- 4 0.5185 29 | 0.4924 34 |  6
> 28 Alabama-Huntsville  24 14-10- 0 0.5833 17 | 0.4994 29 |  4
> 29 Iona                29 14-11- 4 0.5517 23 | 0.4958 31 |  2
> 30 Rensselaer          30 15-13- 2 0.5333 27 | 0.4918 35 |  1
> 31 Sacred Heart        28 13-10- 5 0.5536 22 | 0.4732 37 |  1
>
> The Pairwise Ranking is a system which attemps to mimic the method used
> by
> the NCAA Selection Committee to determine participants for the NCAA
> Division I men's ice hockey tournament. The PWR compares teams at or
> above
> .500, judging them by five criteria: record against common opponents,
> record in last 16 games, head to head competition, record against other
> teams at or above .500, and the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI).
>
> For each comparison won, a team receives one point. The final PWR
> ranking
> is based on the number of points (comparisons) won against teams at or
> above .500. Ties are settled by the RPI.
>
> The PWR can be reformatted and redistributed by any media outlet or
> person, provided USCHO's URL (http://www.uscho.com/) accompanies the
> results.
>
> Note: A team's record is based only on games against other Division I
> hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament. In
> particular,
> only non-exhibition matchups between schools in the six major
> conferences
> count towards a team's record as used in the RPI and PWR. Other games,
> including contests against Canadian schools and tournament-ineligible
> D-I
> programs, are not counted.
>
>
> USCHO.com Division I Women's Poll
> February 26, 2001
>
>    Team (First Place)       Record  Pts   Last
>  1 Dartmouth (9)           21- 3-1   99     1
>  2 Minnesota-Duluth (1)    22- 5-3   84     2
>  - Minnesota               23- 6-1   84     4
>  4 Harvard                 19- 8-0   66     3
>  5 St. Lawrence            20- 6-3   62     5
>  6 Brown                   17- 5-3   55     6
>  7 Wisconsin               17- 8-5   36     7
>  8 Northeastern            15-13-1   28     9
>  9 New Hampshire           17-14-0   17     8
> 10 Providence              17-12-3    9    10
>  - Niagara                 17-13-4    9     -
>
> Others receiving votes: Ohio State 1
>
> The USCHO.com Poll is compiled by U.S. College Hockey Online, and
> consists
> of 10 voters, each a coach of a Division I program.
>
> 2000-2001 Division I Women's Pairwise Rankings (PWR)
> Through Sunday, February 25, 2001
>
> Rk Team                GP  W- L- T  Win%  Rk     RPI  Rk  PWR
>  1 Dartmouth           25 21- 3- 1 0.8600  1 | 0.6548  1 | 12
>  2 Minnesota           30 23- 6- 1 0.7833  2 | 0.6136  2 | 11
>  3 Minnesota-Duluth    30 22- 5- 3 0.7833  2 | 0.6106  3 | 10
>  4 St. Lawrence        29 20- 6- 3 0.7414  4 | 0.6102  4 |  9
>  5 Harvard             27 19- 8- 0 0.7037  6 | 0.6070  5 |  8
>  6 Brown               25 17- 5- 3 0.7400  5 | 0.6044  6 |  7
>  7 Wisconsin           30 17- 8- 5 0.6500  7 | 0.5633  7 |  6
>  8 Northeastern        29 15-13- 1 0.5345 11 | 0.5388  8 |  5
>  9 New Hampshire       31 17-14- 0 0.5484  9 | 0.5388  9 |  4
> 10 Niagara             33 16-13- 4 0.5455 10 | 0.5098 10 |  3
> 11 Providence          30 15-12- 3 0.5500  8 | 0.5092 11 |  2
> 12 Princeton           27 12-12- 3 0.5000 13 | 0.5033 13 |  1
> 13 Maine               28 14-13- 1 0.5179 12 | 0.4891 15 |  0
>
> The Pairwise Ranking is a system which attemps to mimic the method used
> by
> the NCAA Selection Committee to determine participants for the NCAA
> Division I women's ice hockey tournament. The PWR compares teams at or
> above .500, judging them by five criteria: record against common
> opponents, record in last 16 games, head to head competition, record
> against other teams at or above .500, and the Ratings Percentage Index
> (RPI)
>
> For each comparison won, a team receives one point. The final PWR
> ranking
> is based on the number of points (comparisons) won against teams at or
> above .500. Ties are settled by the RPI.
>
> The PWR can be reformatted and redistributed by any media outlet or
> person, provided USCHO's URL (http://www.uscho.com/) accompanies the
> results.
>
> Note: A team's record is based only on games against other Division I
> hockey schools which play in a Division I conference. In particular,
> only
> non-exhibition matchups between schools in the ECAC, GLWHL and WCHA
> conferences and non-conference games (denoted "NC" in USCHO's schedules)
> between these teams count towards a team's record as used in the RPI and
> PWR. Other games, including contests against Canadian schools and
> tournament-ineligible D-I programs, are not counted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> X-SMTP-From: [log in to unmask]
> X-SMTP-To: [log in to unmask]
> X-SMTP-To: [log in to unmask]
> X-SMTP-To: [log in to unmask]
> Received: from mail.uscollegehockey.com (mail.uscollegehockey.com
> [209.98.236.138]) by voyager.umeres.maine.edu with SMTP id MSGILVMN;
> Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:05:38 GMT
> Received: from localhost (info@localhost) by
> slapshot.uscollegehockey.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14568; Mon,
> 26 Feb 2001 17:03:45 -0600
> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:03:45 -0600 (CST)
> From: Lee Urton <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Lee Urton <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: USCHO.com Polls - 02/26/2001
> Message-ID:
> <[log in to unmask]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2