ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bob Woodbury <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:24:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I believe Orono High School is higher in its rankings than Maine is in
its rankings.

D. B. Doucette wrote:

>Here is the latest from the WTIO Men's Division 1 NCAA Hockey Poll:
>
>the University of Maine is once again # 1, for the 19th consecutive week
>this year, and has led this poll every year since 1977.
>
>Of course, WTIO stands for:  Which Team In Orono ? hehehehe
>
>Any "subjective" voting poll is inherently suspect.  Look at Div. 1 college
>football and the use of voter polls toward BCS rankings for that point.
>
>For those that don't know, in NCAA Div. 1 Hockey, the PWR rankings form the
>basis of its post-season Tournament selection process.  PWR is as objective
>as any ranking used for any other of the college sports, and the
>professional leagues, for that matter.  While the Hockey committee "bonus"
>adder is indeed subjective, the committee uses PWR in a more objective way
>than do the other NCAA selection committees who incorporate the PWR in the
>other sports, most notably the Basketball committee.
>
>To shed light on this as we get closer to crunch time, follow this link:
>
>http://www.uscho.com/FAQs/?data=selection
>
>One thing this year:  Maine should be very grateful the Tournament is now 16
>teams instead of 12.
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2