Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 14:52:29 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
<001a01c2d04b$a1794880$1ffbdcd8@sdority> |
Organization: |
Pit of Ultimate Darkness |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hey All,
As one of the aforementioned "lurkers" I just wanted to say that I
appreciate the back and forth discussions. And I would like to think that
all opinions are welcome.
I lurk, primarily because I live and work in Longmont Colorado, and you fine
folks on this list are my lifeline to the "HomeLand", as it were! I look
forward to the "eye witness accounts" of all aspects of the play of the Black
Bears.
Speaking of which, how did they look during the Merrimack game? 4-2 is a
nice win, and at this time of year all wins are vital.
Thanks and keep the frank dialogue coming!
Dean in Colorado
On Sunday 09 February 2003 07:57, Scott Dority wrote:
> The "Shawn" reference was merely to illustrate the play in the defensive
> zone can not be tolerated. It is the reason they nearly lost to Lowell and
> Merrimack, and did loose to BC and UNH. I thought this discussion list was
> just that; a forum in which fans could voice thier opinions during the
> course of the season. If one's comments are going to be slammed because
> they aren't touchy-feely enough, one has to wonder about the purpose of the
> list in the first place. There have been comments about "lurkers" on the
> list that never post thier opinions. This is why. The focus of my post was
> disreguarded and the symantics attacted. What about the rest of it? As far
> as tarnishing Shawns memory, watch it; them's fight'in words.
|
|
|