Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:03:53 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't know what the deal with Noeth was, but I was getting pretty sick of
him too! He called it very close and there were definitely times where I
wished he would just let the guys play. I'd definitely like to hear the
opinion of people who were actually at the game, maybe they had a better
view of what was going on?
Holly
> ----------
> From: Steven Archer[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To: The Maine Hockey Discussion List
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 1999 11:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: congratulations!
>
>
> >hockey. It also helped that the teams rose above what was not a very
> good
> >officiating job and made the game that much better.
> >
>
> i'm interested that this hasn't ben brought up before. Probably because
> of the elation that we are all feeling at this time. This also struck me.
> As I was watching the game I made several comments as to how Noeth seemed
> to be the man who wanted the spotlight. He called the game EXTREMELY
> tight. He did this as well with the BC game on thursday. Not what one
> would expect in a game where the talent is supposed to shine and not the
> special teams. Had maine had their A Power play going like they did in
> the first half of the season the game wouldn't have even been close. Now
> i know that UNH fans and myself as well will say UNH just did an great job
> on the PK but i don't know how much that is true.
> I don't know how the NC$$ chooses the officials for the tourney but i know
> that many people believe that Noeth is not even a "good" offical. Being
> from the CCHA (I believe) i don't much about his style but if he has a
> reputation of caling it that tight why would he be a choice for these
> games? Like I said before, these games should be decided by the players
> not the officials.
>
> Having said all that, i will say that seeing the replay of all the calls
> almost all were technically penalties but MOST should have been let go.
> Being a part time referee myself as well as a 15 year veteran of tier II,
> High School, and club college hockey, The game that has less calls is
> always more enjoyable.
>
> finally, I will entertain the thought that Noeth was aware of the history
> between the teams (both games) and was trying to keep it from getting to
> rough. Unfortunately he never gave them a chance to police themselves.
> His first call were of the cheap variety (still penalties but should have
> been let go). The call that stands out the most is the one against maine
> for the bench delay of game. If i remember correctly that put them down 2
> men. If he wanted to make a statement to the coaches (especially shawn)
> about their trying to get a line advantage he should have given fair
> warning to both coaches first. while i was watching espn and they may
> have just ignored that I doubt it.
>
> OK, enough venting about officiating. I am not ccomplianing that it had
> anything to do with the outcome but it did make the game more choppy
>
> i am interested to hear from both teams and other officails on this. I
> could be very wrong
>
> Steve
> bapst 94
>
>
|
|
|