ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
clair chesley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:01:29 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
The +/- stastic isn't really very meaningful for a single game.  It's
like trying to measure how well a baseball player is batting from his
average for one game.  If he goes 3 for 4 (or .750) in a game you can
say he had a good game, but that's about it.
 
---Kelly Clifford <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> "Anybody know Cullen's +/- from the Sunday game? Seven goals!  I
figured
> he'd have at least four assists."
>
> suprisingly, Cullen only had a +1 on Saturday's game, compared to a +2
> on Friday.  Saturday, the defensive tandem of Wood and Ek had all the
> luck...Ek was +4 and while Eddy was a +2, he still was on the ice for
> four goals, including his own!  the line of Larose, Kariya and
> Gustafsson was +7 on the day, combining for 3 of our seven goals.
>
> hope this helps...
> Kelly
> head statistician :)
>
> PS...congrats also to Jimmy Leger and Niko Dimitrakos who also scored
> their first goals of the season this weekend!!!
>
 
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2