Actually, the word at the game was that both teams left the ice late after
warmups.  And, strangely enough, the teams skated 4x4 for the first 2
minutes of the game.  Both of these items may have something to do with the
fact that the referee was Dan Murphy, one of the more "erratic" officials in
the ECAC.

Anne

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe LaCour" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: Cornell weekend boxes


> Maybe the (a) they came out in the wrong order and (b) players skated
around
> on the ice instead of proceeding (more or less) directly to their
benches??
>
> But, since their were more than 1 coincidental penalties, the teams skated
> 5x5. :)
>
> Joe LaCour
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Satow, Clay" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Cornell weekend boxes
>
>
> > Bill Fenwick listed the Cornell/Clarkson box score:
> >
> > >>
> > . . .
> >
> > > First period . . .
> > >
> > >      Penalties:
> > >      CLA Bench (game protocol, served by Gasper Sekelj), 0:00; CLA
> Murray
> > >      Kuntz (delay of game), 0:00; COR Bench (game protocol, served by
> > >      David Kozier), 0:00; COR Travis Bell (delay of game), 0:00 <<
> > >
> > Not that it really matters, but I'm curious.  What'd they do?  I've
heard
> of
> > protocol penalties for the wrong team coming out first, but this is both
> > teams getting a protocol and a delay.
> >
> > Clay
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>