If the NC$$ were to adopt the current NHL rule, none of what you just
mentioned would matter...........Take for example a goal scored by Vancouver
in their playoff series with Calgary last night:  A Vancouver player was
standing almost completely in the crease, and a shot from the point hit him
in the chest before going in.  As long as that player was not interfering
with the goaltender (with neither Hamilton or Damon were doing), then there
is no issue with the goal.

Brent

>
> I'm sure I haven't read much or most of what has been written about the
> disallow of the goal, but what I saw was a bit different from what I've
> seen reported:
>
> Damon's skate was in the crease illegally, not Hamilton's!
>
> As Derek was receiving the pass/shot, his skate briefly entered the
> crease before the puck.  The puck slid briefly through the crease. About
> this time, Mike's stick entered the crease.  Derek stick handled, bring
> the puck just outside the crease. Mike's foot went into the crease ...
> and then Derek put the puck past Berkhoel on the short side.
>
> So what matters with the current rule (and proposed, nhl, rule),
> including what can be reviewed?
>
> cheers, wayne
>