Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 May 1998 15:25:23 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<980501152005.ZM26452@splotch> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 1 May 1998, Bill Fenwick wrote:
> On May 1, 13:43, Richard Hungerford wrote:
> >Add that all up and you have the 40 varsity teams we need for an NC$$
> >National Title!
>
> Ah, but some of the 40 are Div. I and some are Div. III, right? Which means
> there aren't enough in either division to meet the NCAA criteria for a
> championship tournament.
But some sports (Men's Volleyball is the one that comes to mind) don't
separate by divisions. They simply have one "National Collegiate"
tournament, and one "National Collegiate" champion.
I wonder if the same could be done with Women's Hockey.
> "All I know is that Mr. Clinton's ratings keep on going up, so maybe you
> people should find something else--"
> -- Sid Hartman, Minneapolis _Star Tribune_ sports columnist, asked on a sports
> talk show to give his thoughts on Tara Lipinski
ROFL.
See you later,
John
--
John Edwards - Carleton (Ont) '96, Manitoba '00 - [log in to unmask]
Let me get right on that, with thinking. - Officer Barbrady
The opinions expressed are mine alone, because everybody else says I'm weird.
NOTE: I reserve the right to forward any obnoxious and/or stupid mail.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|