Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 1994 14:17:42 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
In reply to your message of WED 02 NOV 1994 12:18:03 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Dave Hendrickson writes: Before anybody played any games, there were
>polls based on expectations. That is true, but games have been played
>and of course early season polls mean very little I think it is foolish
>to even have Harvard rated in any poll until they at least play a game.
>I always thought polls were based on the overall performance and record
>of a team not upcoming expectations.
>
>Brad Cuyler. NMU
I looked back at some of the most recent polls sent out, and most do
have Harvard ranked between #5 and #6. However, in the WMPL poll,
Harvard did not make the top ten. It appears that the voters are
having this same debate. I believe that if the preseason expectations
of Harvard had them ranked #6, they should not drop out of the poll
just because they have not played any games yet. What has happened in
the hockey-l poll is what I would expect; teams seem to be jumping
ahead of Harvard after big wins or falling behind them after losses.
I would disagree if Harvard ever moved up in the polls without
playing any games.
Brian
Lafayette College '97
|
|
|