Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 91 11:16:37 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wayne Smith writes . . .
> >Trying to be objective, I have seen maybe 4-5 games this season that I
> >would say that there was good officiating. Maybe my view is colored. Maybe
> >all our views are colored. Any comments appreciated...
> The refs just call it like they see it. One guy can't see everything.
> Two or three refs can't be used because the rules aren't interpreted the
> same from ref-to-ref and from game-to-game and from minute-to-minute.
> You can hold a little, but not too much. You can slash a little, but
> not too hard. You can hook a little, but he'd better not fall down.
How 'bout in basketball? It is clear that basketball officiating is an
equally objective art, but they manage (somehow) to coordinate themselves.
I think hockey could use another ref on the ice, or should allow linesmen
to call penalties. You wouldn't have Ahola getting off scot-free with Roy
down.
> ... but geez ... it's a heck of a game!
Ain't that the truth!
--
Josh Hartmann | ___ ___ | ``the imagination is like an
[log in to unmask] | | | | | | engine that can work on many
mit-eddie!mit-athena!josh | / | | | \ | different fuels: but it must
BITNET: your gateway | / / \ / \ \ | be powered, and sex, properly
DISCLAIMER: My parents | |___| |___| |___| | used, is a fuel of high
already claimed me | MAINE HOCKEY! | potency'' -- PROPAGANDA
|
|
|