Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 1994 00:10:27 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The non-qualifiers have finally played enough games, so I have decided
to include them in TCHCR for the rest of the season. By "enough games"
I really mean that each has played at least 1 team that does qualify
for the tournament.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The College Hockey Computer Rating
Includes games on 2/27/94. Last ranking includes games on 2/20/94.
Last Division I
Rank Rank Team Record Performance Schedule Rating
1 1 Michigan 28 5 1 67.65 1 1.44 26 69.08
2 2 Boston University 23 7 1 51.61 3 13.30 12 64.91
3 4 Colorado College 21 9 4 35.29 6 17.27 10 52.56
4 6 Minnesota 19 11 4 23.53 12 24.23 7 47.76
5 3 Wisconsin 20 13 1 20.59 15 25.70 5 46.29
6 5 Northern Michigan 19 14 1 14.71 20 26.28 4 40.99
7 7 Lake Superior 22 9 4 37.14 5 3.17 24 40.32
8 10 Harvard 18 4 3 56.00 2 -16.27 38 39.73
9 11 St Cloud 17 11 4 18.75 17 18.06 9 36.81
10 15 New Hampshire 19 11 2 25.00 10 9.30 18 34.30
11 9 Mass-Lowell 18 8 7 30.30 7 2.55 25 32.85
12 12 Northeastern 17 11 5 18.18 18 11.76 13 29.94
13 13 Western Michigan 19 10 3 28.12 8 1.36 27 29.49
14 8 Michigan State 17 10 5 21.88 14 6.14 23 28.01
15 16 Maine 16 12 4 12.50 21 15.15 11 27.65
16 14 Alaska-Anchorage 15 15 2 0.00 26 25.43 6 25.43
17 22 Miami 16 13 1 10.00 22 8.05 20 18.05
18 17 Denver 15 17 2 -5.88 29 21.13 8 15.24
19 23 Boston College 15 13 4 6.25 24 8.30 19 14.55
20 21 Minnesota-Duluth 13 18 3 -14.71 31 26.79 3 12.09
21 18 Bowling Green 16 13 2 9.68 23 1.22 28 10.90
22 19 RPI 15 8 4 25.93 9 -15.41 34 10.52
23 20 Alaska-Fairbanks 18 11 0 24.14 11 -17.18 40 6.96
24 26 Clarkson 14 8 4 23.08 13 -16.70 39 6.37
25 24 Brown 13 8 4 20.00 16 -15.79 35 4.21
26 25 North Dakota 10 20 4 -29.41 37 29.96 1 0.55
27 30 Vermont 11 10 6 3.70 25 -11.49 32 -7.78
28 28 Providence 11 17 3 -19.35 32 10.46 14 -8.90
29 27 Merrimack 11 17 2 -20.00 33 9.91 17 -10.09
30 29 Michigan Tech 9 23 5 -37.84 43 27.37 2 -10.47
31 31 Colgate 12 12 2 0.00 26 -18.97 42 -18.97
32 32 Ferris State 12 21 1 -26.47 36 7.34 22 -19.13
33 36 Union 9 9 4 0.00 26 -21.78 43 -21.78
34 34 Notre Dame 8 20 5 -36.36 41 10.08 15 -26.28
35 33 Illinois-Chicago 9 23 2 -41.18 44 10.02 16 -31.15
36 39 Cornell 7 13 5 -24.00 35 -9.63 31 -33.63
37 37 Kent 10 22 2 -35.29 39 0.71 29 -34.59
38 38 Princeton 8 13 3 -20.83 34 -17.69 41 -38.52
39 35 Ohio State 5 18 5 -46.43 47 7.79 21 -38.64
40 40 St Lawrence 9 19 0 -35.71 40 -16.20 37 -51.91
41 41 Air Force 7 15 0 -36.36 41 -16.12 36 -52.48
42 43 Dartmouth 5 19 1 -56.00 48 -8.02 30 -64.02
43 44 Yale 4 20 1 -64.00 51 -12.30 33 -76.30
44 42 *Canisius 3 1 0 50.00 4 -138.22 48 -88.22
45 45 *Mass-Amherst 5 6 0 -9.09 30 -87.86 45 -96.95
46 46 Army 6 16 0 -45.45 46 -58.55 44 -104.00
47 47 *U Connecticut 2 4 0 -33.33 38 -113.23 46 -146.56
48 48 *Fairfield 3 2 1 16.67 19 -178.01 51 -161.34
49 49 *Villanova 2 5 0 -42.86 45 -145.32 50 -188.17
50 50 *Holy Cross 1 4 0 -60.00 50 -131.08 47 -191.08
51 51 *Iona 1 5 1 -57.14 49 -141.17 49 -198.32
PERFORMANCE is based on won-lost record only; game sites and margin of victory
are not considered, for example. Performance ranges from +100 (for an
undefeated and untied team) to -100 (for a winless and untied team), with
a .500 winning percentage getting a zero performance.
SCHEDULE is the average rating of a team's opponents.
RATING is the sum of performance and schedule and represents an evaluation of
how each team has done so far with respect to the rest of college hockey.
Based on 687 Division I games. Includes all Division I teams. * = not eligible
for the NCAA tournament
In accordance with NCAA statistical by-laws, Maine's forfeited wins against
Providence are being counted as Maine victories. Thus, the records for Maine
and Providence appear to be incorrect.
Please note that TCHCR is not the same as the Rating Percentage Index used by
the NCAA Ice Hockey Selection Committee. But TCHCR will be treating the Maine
forfeits the same way for consistency.
|
|
|