Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 2003 19:16:03 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't know if I could legitimately say goalie A is better than goalie B. I think what we have is 2 of the best around, and both very different from eachother. I guess I just like Jimmy's style better, and probably because when I first saw him (last year on tv), his ability for his age is what made me appreciate him. Again, not that I don't appreciate Doyle, as he didn't exactly get much time prior to last year....
The play in the third where prov got the 5 minute major, I did not get a clear view of, so I cant comment for you Jim.
Any word on Deschamps Mom, I heard that it was his Mom that got hit by a puck that flew into the stand and looked like it caught her around the ear. She was smiling a minute or two later.
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Date: 2003/11/23 Sun AM 10:04:59 EST
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Providence
>
> > From: Jeff and Tracy <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Providence
>
> > Frank is a GREAT goalie. It wasn't his best game, but I still personally like Jimmy better.
>
> Jeff -- can you say why Jimmy is better or why you like him better? Just curious.
>
> I find Frank the far more consistent of the two -- Jimmy has a yo-yo approach to goaltending that lets some dribble in that should never go in as if he is saving the flash-and-dazzle for an easy stop.
>
> He has great promise, no question, and will mature into a better-than-good goalie. I am quick to factor his just turning 19 in May to Frank's 23 in September, too. But, when it comes to crunch time right now this year, I'd play Frank.
>
|
|
|