Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 Aug 1998 01:15:37 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
a better response than I expected - there is still hope. I noticed this
sort of thing, it is partly why I am here. If there is any character from
which to learn how to break through the existing malpractice, it is
Pound's - the professional. And I am 24, so I have, hopefully, about half a
century to try and do something about it. I'll be the Dr Sweeney of
literary criticism, and will start with looking at Eliot through Pound.
In good spirit,
Arwin van Arum
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Arwin wrote:
> However, I am amazed (not to say shocked) that none of you have
recommended
> any essay by Pound himself. This is a severe oversight, if I may say so
> myself. It is more important to first know what a poet himself thought he
> was doing.
This sort of thinking has not been fashionable for decades in the American
Academy. Secondary lit has become as important primary lit in English
Departments here, if not more so. Welcome to the world of fin de siecle
criticism. Such recommendations will become more and more common as
literature disappears from our depts.
Craig Hamilton
University of Maryland
|
|
|