Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:09:57 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
<38E1FD77.14606.4415E8A@localhost> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Right; though that statement may seem self-contradictory, both camps
are really saying the same thing - big ice means more offense. However,
the "focus" of teams on the larger ice must be defensive, lest a team get
their you-know-what handed to them by not playing disciplined,
position hockey on the larger sheet. At least, I *think* that's what they
meant.
> JoeL wrote, in part..
> > Denver's coach George Gwozdeki (sp) made an interesting point in one of
> > the west regional games saying that the coaches seem to prefer the NHL
> > sheet as it lends itself to more of an offensive game as opposed to the
> > defensive minded game you play on the international sheet.
> ...
> > Can anyone out there voice credence to Coach G's remarks?
>
> Shawn Walsh has recently echoed this sentiment.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|