Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 Oct 1992 17:16:39 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> On an interview on WJR Detroit this noon, a statement was made (I caught
> only the tail end of the interview so I don't know who was speaking, but
> it sounded knowledgeable enough, that Dallas Drake has been told that it
> is OK for him to move out of the Hotel Ponchartrain and find housing in
> Detroit; sounds like he is in with the parent Wings.
>
Yes! Yes! Yes!!! Way to go, Dally!!
BTW--although it's my least favorite side of hockey, I noted with
interest the morning NHL highlights on ESPN included a protracted
fight between Drake's former NMU teammate Jim Hiller of the Kings and an
opponent who got some incredible number of penalty minutes in that one
game--like 100+!
> Subject: New Rules
>
> Thanks to Mike for posting the new rules. Most, I think, are good ideas -
> e.g., I like rule 4-2(e) that allows teams to skate full strength after
> co-incidental minors. On the other hand, I don't think so highly of the
> corresponding rule 4-3(b) for coincidental majors. IMHO if someone gets a
> major, even coincidental, the teams should be short handed. Not making them
> shorthanded takes a little of the sting out of the penalty and, I fear, will
> make major penalty taking a little more common.
I REALLY agree with this sentiment! Here the NHL finally goes to HAVING
the teams skate shorthanded on coincidental minors to increase the
speed, scoring, excitement, and college hockey takes a step backward!
Boo! I LOVE 4-on-4. What's the rationale for not keeping it?
***********************************
* Steve Christopher, NMU *
* "Go 'Cats!''Goin' for it again in *
* '93--With a little less "O" *
* and a lot more "D"! *
* [log in to unmask] *
***********************************
|
|
|