HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rowe, Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rowe, Thomas
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:54:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
But the penalty doesn't actually start until the whistle blows.  Thus, even
though separated in time, they are coincidental.  I've seen that a lot -
delayed penalty called, second player retaliates (even after the whistle),
but both penalties occur at the same point on the clock (since its stopped)
and therefore are coincidental.

> ----------
> From:         Nathan Eric Hampton[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     [log in to unmask]
> Sent:         Monday, January 29, 2001 10:46 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: matching penalties
>
> Is the following right?
>
> Adding to the matching penalties is the issue of coincidental or not. If A
> and
> B are both called for roughing at the same time, then neither team is
> short.
> However, if A is called (delayed penalty) for slashing and later in the
> same
> shift B is called for slashing (retaliation) then they are both short
> (i.e.
> not really conincidental penalties, just reported at the same time). Same
> thing after the whistle, if both get two for roughing then 5x5, but if
> after
> the whistle A punches B and then B slashes A, then it is 4x4 since, again,
> they are not coincidental happenings nor penalties, just reported at the
> same time.
>
> Nathan Eric Hampton
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2