HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe LaCour <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joe LaCour <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:40:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Not quite.  Any equal sum of penalties imposed at the same time is
considered to be coincidental.  Thus, in all your scenarios listed, the
teams would be skating 4 x 4.

Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Eric Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: matching penalties


> Is the following right?
>
> Adding to the matching penalties is the issue of coincidental or not. If A
and
> B are both called for roughing at the same time, then neither team is
short.
> However, if A is called (delayed penalty) for slashing and later in the
same
> shift B is called for slashing (retaliation) then they are both short
(i.e.
> not really conincidental penalties, just reported at the same time). Same
> thing after the whistle, if both get two for roughing then 5x5, but if
after
> the whistle A punches B and then B slashes A, then it is 4x4 since, again,
> they are not coincidental happenings nor penalties, just reported at the
same time.
>
> Nathan Eric Hampton


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2