Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 May 2000 11:49:20 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>Subject: Paying for E-Mail
>>
>>I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P = 5-cents per E-mail
>
>>Sent It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill
>
>>602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on
>every
>>delivered E-mail. Please read the following carefully if you intend to
>
>>stay online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have
>revealed
>>an alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to
>>quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the
>Internet.
>>Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
>
>>bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees". Bill 602P will
>permit
>>the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every E-Mail
>>delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The
>consumer
>>would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington DC lawyer Richard
>>Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming
>law.
>> The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the
>proliferation
>>of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may
>
>>have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a
>letter."
>>Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in
>>1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50
>cents a
>>day - or over $180 per year - above and beyond their regular Internet
>>costs. Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal
>>Service for a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the
>
>>Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are already paying an
>>exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic efficiency. It
>
>>currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast to
>
>>coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it
>will
>>mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States. Our
>congressional
>>representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a "$20-$40 per
>month
>>surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the governments
>>proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have
>>ignored the story - the only exception being the Washingtonian - which
>>called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has
>come"
>>(March 6th, 1999 Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom
>erode
>>away! Send this to E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your
>>friends and relatives to write their congressional representative and
>say
>>"NO" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your time and
>could
very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want.
INFO-HOCKEY-L is for information only; send any discussion of this
article to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Discussion List.
|
|
|