HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:57:55 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I've got a longer response to an earlier message "in production", but
a quick response to Terry's latest:
 
> The 5 March
> PWR ranked Niagara # 9.  Their tournament performance demonstrated that the
> ranking was about correct.
 
Are you telling me you've been basing all of your conclusions on the
PWR from March 5th?  There were two more weekends of results after
that, and the pairwise comparisons the committee used were based on
those results.  In the final, March 19, PWR, available for example at
<http://www.slack.net/~whelan/cgi-bin/tbrw.cgi?rankings> or
<http://www.uscollegehockey.com/rankings/19992000/pwr.cgi>, Niagara
was #5, which the selection committee themselves apparently did not
believe, or they would have seeded Niagara above Michigan State and
Boston College.
                                          John Whelan, Cornell '91
                                                 [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.amurgsval.org/joe/
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2