Again, YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT> Top 20 are all ABOUT the same quality,
regardlesss.... look at the POINT. I will bow out at this point. The
POINT is not about niagara, but about the rating systems.
 
Tony
 
PS: I am tired of saying it, because obviously I feel RPI deserved a
shot, but Niagara "done good" and deserves to be ranked in the top 20,
but can anyone really say a few decimal places distingusih #12 from #8,
I dout it. But again, my point is we are all arguming about two DIFF
things. Separate out your love for Niagara from the discussion at hand,
the ratings.
 
=====================
 
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> Anthony J. Buffa wrote
>
> >At the risk of jumping into the fray as a mediator (an unusual role for
> >those of you that know me :-)
> >
> >..... TNL, I dont think anyone has said they actually disagree with
> >Niagara being picked .... and the quality of the team. Clearly they are
> >in the top 20 in the country.... the arguments have been, and continue
>
> If you deny that Niagara is not in the top 12 in the country. then you
> disagree with Niagara being picked.  I know a lot of people really don't
> want to be confused with the facts, but Niagara did prove themselves to be
> CLEARLY in the top 8 in the country.
>
>
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.