> Let's remember that I'm sharing information that's coming from
> research data from qualified medical professionals.
>
> There is nothing fallacious or sensationalistic about it. I'm conveying it as
> is.
 
No one else false ... it's the conclusions drawn from the data that make the
logic flawed.
 
 
> There is no faulty logic in the scientific process of evaluating injuries.
 
Why not ... there's never been a flawed scientific study??  I even said I would
take a study over anecdotal evidence any day ... but it has to be a worthwhile
study.
 
AW
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.