HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David S Griffel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David S Griffel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 May 1999 14:40:14 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines)
        Does anyone know why the organizers would select this format
for a tournament, including the bogus tiebreaker?  Was B.U. unwilling to
play Quinnipiac?  The format also puts B.U. at a disadvantage, since they
won't have the opportunity to play three periods against Quinnipiac.
        Why not have co-champions if 2, 3, or 4 teams are tied in points?
Or why don't they just play the 4 games and not declare a "champion", as
long as day 2 isn't pitting the winners and losers from day 1 against each
other?
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2