What does the fact that North Dakota having native Minnesotans on their team
have anything to do with UMTC's policy of all in-state players?  While not
being a Gopher hater on the level of some people on this list (lately I've
been ambivalent towards them, but I remember 1976 all too well), I would be
amazed if anyone of those haters would root one way or another with the
Sioux on account of their roster's state origins.  Does this mean I should
root for BC because of all the Massachusetts players on their squad?  I
think you know the answer to that one.
 
 
Edward N. Moller
Controller
Mount Ida College
Newton Centre, MA  02459-3323
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Tel (617) 928-4515
Fax (617) 928-4746
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The College Hockey Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Cutler, Ken
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 10:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Tournament Selection
>
>
> The "all-Minnesota thing" has nothing to do with the fact that the Gophers
> aren't in the tournament this year. They simply weren't a very
> good team for
> a lot of reasons--only one goalie and he was inexperienced, weak defense,
> lack of snipers, lack of development, etc.  But all you Gopher haters
> beware, they will be back.  Meanwhile some of us will enjoy watching UND
> coached by a Minnesotan with a number of Minnesotans on the team and four
> new ones coming in, including three straight from HS.
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
>
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.