>Deciding that you need to change starting goalies based one 30 minutes is
>silly.  If those 30 minutes are in a consolation game that ends the season,
>then doubly so.  I do think that Woog should throw the position open and
let
>someone win it next year, but I'd be surprised if Rob LaRue is that guy.
 
Hey I saw the Game on saturday it was pretty evident that LaRue should be
back next year and that he should have played some more this year, but hey
who am I to question the coach I like the job he is doing right now.  The
friends that I went to the Final Five were all raving about how good a job
he did, I did not take long to realize that LaRue is for real and that he
played a hell of a game.
 
    I also think in retrospect that a lot of this season can also be blamed
on Woog's coaching (but as I said earlier Go ahead keep it up I am not
complaining.  Defense is the key, I don't care how good a goalie plays if
they have philons playing in front of  him they are going to be in trouble.
 
I have another question for Gopher fans. Does anyone see a comparison
between Woog and Clinton. So many people get defensive when others want to
call for his head, certain sports writers get moved to second rate jobs for
speaking the truth.  Why is there not a lot of groundswell of people calling
for his head. Sundays article in the Tribune was pretty tame if you asked
me. If Minnesota hired a new coach today it would probably take two years to
undo the mess that Woog created.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.