Richard Hungerford wrote:
 
>>According to the ECAC website:
 
>>Harvard's 7-6 victory over Northeastern in the first round of the Beanpot
> [which was the second league game between the two] shall act as a 6-6 in
> the league standings but count as a 7-6 Harvard victory in the overall
> standings.  The ECAC does not currently have a league policy that
> addresses league games that are played in regular season tournaments.
League games may only last a maximum of 65:00 [the Harvard victory was at
9:53 of the first OT].  The ECAC and its membership will review these
types of situations at the 1999 spring meetings and formulate a policy for
the future.<<
 
Why don't they do what the men do (I know, three of the four aren't in the
ECAC) and play each other often enough that it doesn't have to count as a
conference game.  Heck, it's not as if it's a long road trip.
 
>>
[. . .]
> 14 Colby            0  15  0-15- 0 .000   6-146   15  0-15- 0 .000   6-146
>
Why is Colby D1?  The 0-15-0, 6-146 record speaks for itself, but some of
the box scores are even more gruesome.  UNH had 54 shots on goal in one
PERIOD, and 81 in two periods.  Harvard had 60 shots in two periods.  (UNH
had four shots in the third, Harvard three; I suppose they were exhausted
from shooting so much in the first two periods, or their coach didn't let
them shoot a la youth hockey).
>
Clay
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.